Remember the appalling but utterly-unsurprising story two months ago where a team of investigative reporters in Sweden uncovered a company in Kenya contracted by Meta to review video content captured by Meta’s “smart” glasses? They spoke to some of the workers, who told tales of reviewing footage of Meta glasses users getting undressed, having sex, and taking dumps. This is a rather seedy job, and a big surprise to most of the people wearing Meta’s AI glasses, who are under the impression that “AI” does not involve human beings in Kenya seeing what their glasses capture.

Well, Meta has fixed the problem. Chris Vallance reports for BBC News:

Meta is under pressure to explain why it cancelled a major contract with a company it was using to train AI, shortly after some of its Kenya-based workers alleged they had to view graphic content captured by Meta smart glasses.

In February, workers at the company, Sama, told two Swedish newspapers they had witnessed glasses users going to the toilet, and having sex.

Less than two months later, Meta ended its contract with Sama, which Sama said would result in 1,108 workers being made redundant.

Meta says it’s because Sama did not meet its standards, a criticism Sama rejects. A Kenyan workers’ organisation alleges Meta’s decision was caused by the staff speaking out.

There’s no mystery here. The “standard” that Sama didn’t meet was keeping their mouths shut about the dignity-shredding nature of the entire operation. Like that fact that it even existed, let alone the gross privacy-invasive footage they witnessed. The deal wasn’t just for Sama’s workers to do the work, it was to do the work and keep it on the down-low. Go to Meta’s AI glasses website and try to find the part where they warn you that footage is subject to review by teams of contractors in third-world countries, Mechanical Turk-style. If you look hard enough, you’ll find oblique allusion to “review may be automated or manual (human)” in their legal small print, but their large-scale human review of video footage and recordings isn’t part of the brand or marketing image for their glasses.

Apple (transcript, MacRumors, Hacker News): The Company posted quarterly revenue of $111.2 billion, up 17 percent year over year. Diluted earnings per share was $2.01, up 22 percent year over year. “Today Apple is proud to report our best March quarter ever, with revenue of $111.2 billion and double-digit growth across every geographic segment,” said […]

Ryan Christoffel (Reddit): Apple recently announced an AI partnership with Google. But reporting indicates the company initially pursued deals with other companies, including Anthropic. Based on new comments from Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, it’s easy to see why. Gurman, speaking on TBPN, said the following: Apple runs on Anthropic at this point. Anthropic is powering a […]

Jess Weatherbed (Hacker News): All empires eventually fall, and it seems the creative software industry has collectively decided that Adobe’s time has come. […] Pricing in particular has given competitors an opening to attack. Some of the best alternatives aren’t just undercutting Adobe’s price — they’re available for free. People love free. […] Perhaps coincidently, […]

One more from Jason Snell, from his analysis of Apple’s quarterly results:

During a complicated question from J.P. Morgan analyst Samik Chatterjee about product margins, Parekh unusually half-answered the question and then stopped and “turned it over to Tim” so that Cook could read an obviously prepared statement about tariffs, which included this bit:

In terms of applying for a refund of tariffs paid, we’re following the established processes, and we plan to reinvest any amount we receive back into U.S. innovation and advanced manufacturing. These would be new investments and would be in addition to our prior commitments in the U.S.

This is the sort of politics Cook will continue to be plying from the boardroom. Sure, Apple’s going to try to get its tariff money back. But it’s going to do so using the perfectly normal and established process, and if it does get billions back from the U.S. government, it double-promises to reinvest that money in the United States, above and beyond its already stated commitments. Trump Administration, take note.

The kind of logic puzzles I enjoy most are ones where, when the puzzle is posed, there’s no obvious solution. But once you see the solution, it seems profoundly obvious. Jason Kottke last week linked to 1D-Chess, a game from Rowan Monk that’s like that. Once you find the solution you can’t unsee it. (Don’t give up and peak at the posted answer!)

The question of tariff refunds is like that. Two months ago the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Trump’s obviously illegal tariffs last year, were, in fact, illegal. They left as an open question, however, whether importers who paid those tariffs should get refunds from the federal government. Apple, obviously, is one of those importers. The logic puzzle is this: if it turns out that Apple is eligible for a refund, how do they collect it without infuriating the petulant Donald Trump? Cook just spelled out the answer. Take the money but commit it all to their longstanding plan to spend $500 billion over the next few years to U.S. manufacturing efforts, a program they’ve maintained through the Trump 1, Biden, and now Trump 2 administrations, but which Cook has made dog-and-pony shows out of during both Trump terms to, as Trump himself describes it, “kiss his ass”.

That’s so obvious, now that Cook spelled it out, that it doesn’t even seem like a puzzle.