Reading List
The most recent articles from a list of feeds I subscribe to.
Flood Fill vs the Magic Circle
Musings from Robin Sloan:
Most olive oil production at medium-or-greater scale depends on machines of this kind [over-the-row olive harvester]; they trundle over trees planted in long rows, almost like continuous hedges, and collect the fruit with vibrating fingers. Machine-harvested olives cost less to buy, and they arrive at the mill in better shape than olives harvested by hand.
The catch: most olives can’t be cultivated in this configuration; the trees don’t thrive so close together. Only a handful of varieties will tolerate it, so those handful have been planted in huge numbers, and the flavor of global olive oil has changed as a result.
AI enables us to do things faster, and sometimes better than we’ve been able to before. But it has its limits. And as we learn those limits, the work we do will shift to avoid them.
In a different section, the article dives into the limitations of the physical world.
The project cut across several different magic circles — Ruby code, quasi-governmental APIs, the rules and standards of the postal system — but/and it also broke out into the physical world of paper, printers, and post offices. The project required manipulations including but not limited to: folding, peeling, sticking … gnarly!!
It’s possible that an AI coding agent could have helped me with #1 above, and of course it could have advised me on the rest. But it’s impossible to imagine the AI agent handling #2-5 autonomously; it would require such a Rube Goldberg tangle of support that “autonomously” would no longer apply.
In our programming world, AI’s impact looks limitless. But once you drift outside the boundaries of software, it’s put into a different perspective.
If indeed AI automation does not flood fill the physical world, it will be because the humble paper jam stood in its way.
Pinterest said he violated laid-off colleagues’ privacy. Now he’s going public
Trump fires US attorney general Pam Bondi
Jack Black wants to join the Red Dead Redemption franchise
OpenAI, Supposedly Tightening Its Focus on Its Core Products, Buys Tech-Industry Talk Show TBPN
Katie Deighton, reporting for The Wall Street Journal (main link is a gift link; also on News+):
OpenAI bought TBPN to encourage constructive conversation around the changes AI creates by helping the show grow, according to a memo sent by Fidji Simo, the OpenAI’s CEO of applications. TBPN will report to Chris Lehane, OpenAI’s chief global affairs officer, and will help with company communications and marketing outside of the show.
“They’ve helped many brands market online and because they have a strong pulse on where the industry is going, their comms and marketing ideas have really impressed me,” Simo wrote in the memo.
But TBPN will remain editorially independent, retaining control over its programming, editorial decisions, guest selection and production schedule, OpenAI said.
Yes, I’m sure they’ll remain totally independent. You know, like The Washington Post under Jeff Bezos, and CBS News under David Ellison. Many news and commentary publications have remained steadfastly independent while reporting to the head of PR for a company they ostensibly cover.