Hello! Recently I ran a terminal survey and I asked people what frustrated them. One person commented:

There are so many pieces to having a modern terminal experience. I wish it all came out of the box.

My immediate reaction was “oh, getting a modern terminal experience isn’t that hard, you just need to….”, but the more I thought about it, the longer the “you just need to…” list got, and I kept thinking about more and more caveats.

So I thought I would write down some notes about what it means to me personally to have a “modern” terminal experience and what I think can make it hard for people to get there.

what is a “modern terminal experience”?

Here are a few things that are important to me, with which part of the system is responsible for them:

• multiline support for copy and paste: if you paste 3 commands in your shell, it should not immediately run them all! That’s scary! (shell, terminal emulator)
• infinite shell history: if I run a command in my shell, it should be saved forever, not deleted after 500 history entries or whatever. Also I want commands to be saved to the history immediately when I run them, not only when I exit the shell session (shell)
• a useful prompt: I can’t live without having my current directory and current git branch in my prompt (shell)
• 24-bit colour: this is important to me because I find it MUCH easier to theme neovim with 24-bit colour support than in a terminal with only 256 colours (terminal emulator)
• clipboard integration between vim and my operating system so that when I copy in Firefox, I can just press p in vim to paste (text editor, maybe the OS/terminal emulator too)
• good autocomplete: for example commands like git should have command-specific autocomplete (shell)
• having colours in ls (shell config)
• a terminal theme I like: I spend a lot of time in my terminal, I want it to look nice and I want its theme to match my terminal editor’s theme. (terminal emulator, text editor)
• automatic terminal fixing: If a programs prints out some weird escape codes that mess up my terminal, I want that to automatically get reset so that my terminal doesn’t get messed up (shell)
• keybindings: I want Ctrl+left arrow to work (shell or application)
• being able to use the scroll wheel in programs like less: (terminal emulator and applications)

There are a million other terminal conveniences out there and different people value different things, but those are the ones that I would be really unhappy without.

how I achieve a “modern experience”

My basic approach is:

1. use the fish shell. Mostly don’t configure it, except to:
   • set the EDITOR environment variable to my favourite terminal editor
   • alias ls to ls --color=auto
2. use any terminal emulator with 24-bit colour support. In the past I’ve used GNOME Terminal, Terminator, and iTerm, but I’m not picky about this. I don’t really configure it other than to choose a font.
3. use neovim, with a configuration that I’ve been very slowly building over the last 9 years or so (the last time I deleted my vim config and started from scratch was 9 years ago)
4. use the base16 framework to theme everything

A few things that affect my approach:

• I don’t spend a lot of time SSHed into other machines
• I’d rather use the mouse a little than come up with keyboard-based ways to do everything
• I work on a lot of small projects, not one big project

some “out of the box” options for a “modern” experience

What if you want a nice experience, but don’t want to spend a lot of time on configuration? Figuring out how to configure vim in a way that I was satisfied with really did take me like ten years, which is a long time!

My best ideas for how to get a reasonable terminal experience with minimal config are:

• shell: either fish or zsh with oh-my-zsh
• terminal emulator: almost anything with 24-bit colour support, for example all of these are popular:
  • linux: GNOME Terminal, Konsole, Terminator, xfce4-terminal
  • mac: iTerm (Terminal.app doesn’t have 256-colour support)
  • cross-platform: kitty, alacritty, wezterm, or ghostty
• shell config:
  • set the EDITOR environment variable to your favourite terminal text editor
  • maybe alias ls to ls --color=auto
• text editor: this is a tough one, maybe micro or helix? I haven’t used either of them seriously but they both seem like very cool projects and I think it’s amazing that you can just use all the usual GUI editor commands (Ctrl-C to copy, Ctrl-V to paste, Ctrl-A to select all) in micro and they do what you’d expect. I would probably try switching to helix except that retraining my vim muscle memory seems way too hard. Also helix doesn’t have a GUI or plugin system yet.

Personally I wouldn’t use xterm, rxvt, or Terminal.app as a terminal emulator, because I’ve found in the past that they’re missing core features (like 24-bit colour in Terminal.app’s case) that make the terminal harder to use for me.

I don’t want to pretend that getting a “modern” terminal experience is easier than it is though – I think there are two issues that make it hard. Let’s talk about them!

issue 1 with getting to a “modern” experience: the shell

bash and zsh are by far the two most popular shells, and neither of them provide a default experience that I would be happy using out of the box, for example:

• you need to customize your prompt
• they don’t come with git completions by default, you have to set them up
• by default, bash only stores 500 (!) lines of history and (at least on Mac OS) zsh is only configured to store 2000 lines, which is still not a lot
• I find bash’s tab completion very frustrating, if there’s more than one match then you can’t tab through them

And even though I love fish, the fact that it isn’t POSIX does make it hard for a lot of folks to make the switch.

Of course it’s totally possible to learn how to customize your prompt in bash or whatever, and it doesn’t even need to be that complicated (in bash I’d probably start with something like export PS1='[\u@\h \W$(__git_ps1 " (%s)")]\$ ', or maybe use starship). But each of these “not complicated” things really does add up and it’s especially tough if you need to keep your config in sync across several systems.

An extremely popular solution to getting a “modern” shell experience is oh-my-zsh. It seems like a great project and I know a lot of people use it very happily, but I’ve struggled with configuration systems like that in the past – it looks like right now the base oh-my-zsh adds about 3000 lines of config, and often I find that having an extra configuration system makes it harder to debug what’s happening when things go wrong. I personally have a tendency to use the system to add a lot of extra plugins, make my system slow, get frustrated that it’s slow, and then delete it completely and write a new config from scratch.

issue 2 with getting to a “modern” experience: the text editor

In the terminal survey I ran recently, the most popular terminal text editors by far were vim, emacs, and nano.

I think the main options for terminal text editors are:

• use vim or emacs and configure it to your liking, you can probably have any feature you want if you put in the work
• use nano and accept that you’re going to have a pretty limited experience (for example I don’t think you can select text with the mouse and then “cut” it in nano)
• use micro or helix which seem to offer a pretty good out-of-the-box experience, potentially occasionally run into issues with using a less mainstream text editor
• just avoid using a terminal text editor as much as possible, maybe use VSCode, use VSCode’s terminal for all your terminal needs, and mostly never edit files in the terminal. Or I know a lot of people use code as their EDITOR in the terminal.

issue 3: individual applications

The last issue is that sometimes individual programs that I use are kind of annoying. For example on my Mac OS machine, /usr/bin/sqlite3 doesn’t support the Ctrl+Left Arrow keyboard shortcut. Fixing this to get a reasonable terminal experience in SQLite was a little complicated, I had to:

• realize why this is happening (Mac OS won’t ship GNU tools, and “Ctrl-Left arrow” support comes from GNU readline)
• find a workaround (install sqlite from homebrew, which does have readline support)
• adjust my environment (put Homebrew’s sqlite3 in my PATH)

I find that debugging application-specific issues like this is really not easy and often it doesn’t feel “worth it” – often I’ll end up just dealing with various minor inconveniences because I don’t want to spend hours investigating them. The only reason I was even able to figure this one out at all is that I’ve been spending a huge amount of time thinking about the terminal recently.

A big part of having a “modern” experience using terminal programs is just using newer terminal programs, for example I can’t be bothered to learn a keyboard shortcut to sort the columns in top, but in htop I can just click on a column heading with my mouse to sort it. So I use htop instead! But discovering new more “modern” command line tools isn’t easy (though I made a list here), finding ones that I actually like using in practice takes time, and if you’re SSHed into another machine, they won’t always be there.

everything affects everything else

Something I find tricky about configuring my terminal to make everything “nice” is that changing one seemingly small thing about my workflow can really affect everything else. For example right now I don’t use tmux. But if I needed to use tmux again (for example because I was doing a lot of work SSHed into another machine), I’d need to think about a few things, like:

• if I wanted tmux’s copy to synchronize with my system clipboard over SSH, I’d need to make sure that my terminal emulator has OSC 52 support
• if I wanted to use iTerm’s tmux integration (which makes tmux tabs into iTerm tabs), I’d need to change how I configure colours – right now I set them with a shell script that I run when my shell starts, but that means the colours get lost when restoring a tmux session.

and probably more things I haven’t thought of. “Using tmux means that I have to change how I manage my colours” sounds unlikely, but that really did happen to me and I decided “well, I don’t want to change how I manage colours right now, so I guess I’m not using that feature!”.

It’s also hard to remember which features I’m relying on – for example maybe my current terminal does have OSC 52 support and because copying from tmux over SSH has always Just Worked I don’t even realize that that’s something I need, and then it mysteriously stops working when I switch terminals.

change things slowly

Personally even though I think my setup is not that complicated, it’s taken me 20 years to get to this point! Because terminal config changes are so likely to have unexpected and hard-to-understand consequences, I’ve found that if I change a lot of terminal configuration all at once it makes it much harder to understand what went wrong if there’s a problem, which can be really disorienting.

So I usually prefer to make pretty small changes, and accept that changes can might take me a REALLY long time to get used to. For example I switched from using ls to eza a year or two ago and while I like it (because eza -l prints human-readable file sizes by default) I’m still not quite sure about it. But also sometimes it’s worth it to make a big change, like I made the switch to fish (from bash) 10 years ago and I’m very happy I did.

getting a “modern” terminal is not that easy

Trying to explain how “easy” it is to configure your terminal really just made me think that it’s kind of hard and that I still sometimes get confused.

I’ve found that there’s never one perfect way to configure things in the terminal that will be compatible with every single other thing. I just need to try stuff, figure out some kind of locally stable state that works for me, and accept that if I start using a new tool it might disrupt the system and I might need to rethink things.

Recently I’ve been thinking about how everything that happens in the terminal is some combination of:

1. Your operating system’s job
2. Your shell’s job
3. Your terminal emulator’s job
4. The job of whatever program you happen to be running (like top or vim or cat)

The first three (your operating system, shell, and terminal emulator) are all kind of known quantities – if you’re using bash in GNOME Terminal on Linux, you can more or less reason about how how all of those things interact, and some of their behaviour is standardized by POSIX.

But the fourth one (“whatever program you happen to be running”) feels like it could do ANYTHING. How are you supposed to know how a program is going to behave?

This post is kind of long so here’s a quick table of contents:

• programs behave surprisingly consistently
• these are meant to be descriptive, not prescriptive
• it’s not always obvious which “rules” are the program’s responsibility to implement
• rule 1: noninteractive programs should quit when you press Ctrl-C
• rule 2: TUIs should quit when you press q
• rule 3: REPLs should quit when you press Ctrl-D on an empty line
• rule 4: don’t use more than 16 colours
• rule 5: vaguely support readline keybindings
• rule 5.1: Ctrl-W should delete the last word
• rule 6: disable colours when writing to a pipe
• rule 7: - means stdin/stdout
• these “rules” take a long time to learn

programs behave surprisingly consistently

As far as I know, there are no real standards for how programs in the terminal should behave – the closest things I know of are:

• POSIX, which mostly dictates how your terminal emulator / OS / shell should work together. I think it does specify a few things about how core utilities like cp should work but AFAIK it doesn’t have anything to say about how for example htop should behave.
• these command line interface guidelines

But even though there are no standards, in my experience programs in the terminal behave in a pretty consistent way. So I wanted to write down a list of “rules” that in my experience programs mostly follow.

these are meant to be descriptive, not prescriptive

My goal here isn’t to convince authors of terminal programs that they should follow any of these rules. There are lots of exceptions to these and often there’s a good reason for those exceptions.

But it’s very useful for me to know what behaviour to expect from a random new terminal program that I’m using. Instead of “uh, programs could do literally anything”, it’s “ok, here are the basic rules I expect, and then I can keep a short mental list of exceptions”.

So I’m just writing down what I’ve observed about how programs behave in my 20 years of using the terminal, why I think they behave that way, and some examples of cases where that rule is “broken”.

it’s not always obvious which “rules” are the program’s responsibility to implement

There are a bunch of common conventions that I think are pretty clearly the program’s responsibility to implement, like:

• config files should go in ~/.BLAHrc or ~/.config/BLAH/FILE or /etc/BLAH/ or something
• --help should print help text
• programs should print “regular” output to stdout and errors to stderr

But in this post I’m going to focus on things that it’s not 100% obvious are the program’s responsibility. For example it feels to me like a “law of nature” that pressing Ctrl-D should quit a REPL, but programs often need to explicitly implement support for it – even though cat doesn’t need to implement Ctrl-D support, ipython does. (more about that in “rule 3” below)

Understanding which things are the program’s responsibility makes it much less surprising when different programs’ implementations are slightly different.

rule 1: noninteractive programs should quit when you press Ctrl-C

The main reason for this rule is that noninteractive programs will quit by default on Ctrl-C if they don’t set up a SIGINT signal handler, so this is kind of a “you should act like the default” rule.

Something that trips a lot of people up is that this doesn’t apply to interactive programs like python3 or bc or less. This is because in an interactive program, Ctrl-C has a different job – if the program is running an operation (like for example a search in less or some Python code in python3), then Ctrl-C will interrupt that operation but not stop the program.

As an example of how this works in an interactive program: here’s the code in prompt-toolkit (the library that iPython uses for handling input) that aborts a search when you press Ctrl-C.

rule 2: TUIs should quit when you press q

TUI programs (like less or htop) will usually quit when you press q.

This rule doesn’t apply to any program where pressing q to quit wouldn’t make sense, like tmux or text editors.

rule 3: REPLs should quit when you press Ctrl-D on an empty line

REPLs (like python3 or ed) will usually quit when you press Ctrl-D on an empty line. This rule is similar to the Ctrl-C rule – the reason for this is that by default if you’re running a program (like cat) in “cooked mode”, then the operating system will return an EOF when you press Ctrl-D on an empty line.

Most of the REPLs I use (sqlite3, python3, fish, bash, etc) don’t actually use cooked mode, but they all implement this keyboard shortcut anyway to mimic the default behaviour.

For example, here’s the code in prompt-toolkit that quits when you press Ctrl-D, and here’s the same code in readline.

I actually thought that this one was a “Law of Terminal Physics” until very recently because I’ve basically never seen it broken, but you can see that it’s just something that each individual input library has to implement in the links above.

Someone pointed out that the Erlang REPL does not quit when you press Ctrl-D, so I guess not every REPL follows this “rule”.

rule 4: don’t use more than 16 colours

Terminal programs rarely use colours other than the base 16 ANSI colours. This is because if you specify colours with a hex code, it’s very likely to clash with some users’ background colour. For example if I print out some text as #EEEEEE, it would be almost invisible on a white background, though it would look fine on a dark background.

But if you stick to the default 16 base colours, you have a much better chance that the user has configured those colours in their terminal emulator so that they work reasonably well with their background color. Another reason to stick to the default base 16 colours is that it makes less assumptions about what colours the terminal emulator supports.

The only programs I usually see breaking this “rule” are text editors, for example Helix by default will use a purple background which is not a default ANSI colour. It seems fine for Helix to break this rule since Helix isn’t a “core” program and I assume any Helix user who doesn’t like that colorscheme will just change the theme.

rule 5: vaguely support readline keybindings

Almost every program I use supports readline keybindings if it would make sense to do so. For example, here are a bunch of different programs and a link to where they define Ctrl-E to go to the end of the line:

• ipython (Ctrl-E defined here)
• atuin (Ctrl-E defined here)
• fzf (Ctrl-E defined here)
• zsh (Ctrl-E defined here)
• fish (Ctrl-E defined here)
• tmux’s command prompt (Ctrl-E defined here)

None of those programs actually uses readline directly, they just sort of mimic emacs/readline keybindings. They don’t always mimic them exactly: for example atuin seems to use Ctrl-A as a prefix, so Ctrl-A doesn’t go to the beginning of the line.

Also all of these programs seem to implement their own internal cut and paste buffers so you can delete a line with Ctrl-U and then paste it with Ctrl-Y.

The exceptions to this are:

• some programs (like git, cat, and nc) don’t have any line editing support at all (except for backspace, Ctrl-W, and Ctrl-U)
• as usual text editors are an exception, every text editor has its own approach to editing text

I wrote more about this “what keybindings does a program support?” question in entering text in the terminal is complicated.

rule 5.1: Ctrl-W should delete the last word

I’ve never seen a program (other than a text editor) where Ctrl-W doesn’t delete the last word. This is similar to the Ctrl-C rule – by default if a program is in “cooked mode”, the OS will delete the last word if you press Ctrl-W, and delete the whole line if you press Ctrl-U. So usually programs will imitate that behaviour.

I can’t think of any exceptions to this other than text editors but if there are I’d love to hear about them!

rule 6: disable colours when writing to a pipe

Most programs will disable colours when writing to a pipe. For example:

• rg blah will highlight all occurrences of blah in the output, but if the output is to a pipe or a file, it’ll turn off the highlighting.
• ls --color=auto will use colour when writing to a terminal, but not when writing to a pipe

Both of those programs will also format their output differently when writing to the terminal: ls will organize files into columns, and ripgrep will group matches with headings.

If you want to force the program to use colour (for example because you want to look at the colour), you can use unbuffer to force the program’s output to be a tty like this:

unbuffer rg blah |  less -R

I’m sure that there are some programs that “break” this rule but I can’t think of any examples right now. Some programs have an --color flag that you can use to force colour to be on, in the example above you could also do rg --color=always | less -R.

rule 7: - means stdin/stdout

Usually if you pass - to a program instead of a filename, it’ll read from stdin or write to stdout (whichever is appropriate). For example, if you want to format the Python code that’s on your clipboard with black and then copy it, you could run:

pbpaste | black - | pbcopy

(pbpaste is a Mac program, you can do something similar on Linux with xclip)

My impression is that most programs implement this if it would make sense and I can’t think of any exceptions right now, but I’m sure there are many exceptions.

these “rules” take a long time to learn

These rules took me a long time for me to learn because I had to:

1. learn that the rule applied anywhere at all ("Ctrl-C will exit programs")
2. notice some exceptions (“okay, Ctrl-C will exit find but not less”)
3. subconsciously figure out what the pattern is ("Ctrl-C will generally quit noninteractive programs, but in interactive programs it might interrupt the current operation instead of quitting the program")
4. eventually maybe formulate it into an explicit rule that I know

A lot of my understanding of the terminal is honestly still in the “subconscious pattern recognition” stage. The only reason I’ve been taking the time to make things explicit at all is because I’ve been trying to explain how it works to others. Hopefully writing down these “rules” explicitly will make learning some of this stuff a little bit faster for others.

Here’s a niche terminal problem that has bothered me for years but that I never really understood until a few weeks ago. Let’s say you’re running this command to watch for some specific output in a log file:

tail -f /some/log/file | grep thing1 | grep thing2

If log lines are being added to the file relatively slowly, the result I’d see is… nothing! It doesn’t matter if there were matches in the log file or not, there just wouldn’t be any output.

I internalized this as “uh, I guess pipes just get stuck sometimes and don’t show me the output, that’s weird”, and I’d handle it by just running grep thing1 /some/log/file | grep thing2 instead, which would work.

So as I’ve been doing a terminal deep dive over the last few months I was really excited to finally learn exactly why this happens.

why this happens: buffering

The reason why “pipes get stuck” sometimes is that it’s VERY common for programs to buffer their output before writing it to a pipe or file. So the pipe is working fine, the problem is that the program never even wrote the data to the pipe!

This is for performance reasons: writing all output immediately as soon as you can uses more system calls, so it’s more efficient to save up data until you have 8KB or so of data to write (or until the program exits) and THEN write it to the pipe.

In this example:

tail -f /some/log/file | grep thing1 | grep thing2

the problem is that grep thing1 is saving up all of its matches until it has 8KB of data to write, which might literally never happen.

programs don’t buffer when writing to a terminal

Part of why I found this so disorienting is that tail -f file | grep thing will work totally fine, but then when you add the second grep, it stops working!! The reason for this is that the way grep handles buffering depends on whether it’s writing to a terminal or not.

Here’s how grep (and many other programs) decides to buffer its output:

• Check if stdout is a terminal or not using the isatty function
  • If it’s a terminal, use line buffering (print every line immediately as soon as you have it)
  • Otherwise, use “block buffering” – only print data if you have at least 8KB or so of data to print

So if grep is writing directly to your terminal then you’ll see the line as soon as it’s printed, but if it’s writing to a pipe, you won’t.

Of course the buffer size isn’t always 8KB for every program, it depends on the implementation. For grep the buffering is handled by libc, and libc’s buffer size is defined in the BUFSIZ variable. Here’s where that’s defined in glibc.

(as an aside: “programs do not use 8KB output buffers when writing to a terminal” isn’t, like, a law of terminal physics, a program COULD use an 8KB buffer when writing output to a terminal if it wanted, it would just be extremely weird if it did that, I can’t think of any program that behaves that way)

commands that buffer & commands that don’t

One annoying thing about this buffering behaviour is that you kind of need to remember which commands buffer their output when writing to a pipe.

Some commands that don’t buffer their output:

• tail
• cat
• tee

I think almost everything else will buffer output, especially if it’s a command where you’re likely to be using it for batch processing. Here’s a list of some common commands that buffer their output when writing to a pipe, along with the flag that disables block buffering.

• grep (--line-buffered)
• sed (-u)
• awk (there’s a fflush() function)
• tcpdump (-l)
• jq (-u)
• tr (-u)
• cut (can’t disable buffering)

Those are all the ones I can think of, lots of unix commands (like sort) may or may not buffer their output but it doesn’t matter because sort can’t do anything until it finishes receiving input anyway.

Also I did my best to test both the Mac OS and GNU versions of these but there are a lot of variations and I might have made some mistakes.

programming languages where the default “print” statement buffers

Also, here are a few programming language where the default print statement will buffer output when writing to a pipe, and some ways to disable buffering if you want:

• C (disable with setvbuf)
• Python (disable with python -u, or PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1, or sys.stdout.reconfigure(line_buffering=False), or print(x, flush=True))
• Ruby (disable with STDOUT.sync = true)
• Perl (disable with $| = 1)

I assume that these languages are designed this way so that the default print function will be fast when you’re doing batch processing.

Also whether output is buffered or not might depend on how you print, for example in C++ cout << "hello\n" buffers when writing to a pipe but cout << "hello" << endl will flush its output.

when you press Ctrl-C on a pipe, the contents of the buffer are lost

Let’s say you’re running this command as a hacky way to watch for DNS requests to example.com, and you forgot to pass -l to tcpdump:

sudo tcpdump -ni any port 53 | grep example.com

When you press Ctrl-C, what happens? In a magical perfect world, what I would want to happen is for tcpdump to flush its buffer, grep would search for example.com, and I would see all the output I missed.

But in the real world, what happens is that all the programs get killed and the output in tcpdump’s buffer is lost.

I think this problem is probably unavoidable – I spent a little time with strace to see how this works and grep receives the SIGINT before tcpdump anyway so even if tcpdump tried to flush its buffer grep would already be dead.

After a little more investigation, there is a workaround: if you find tcpdump’s PID and kill -TERM $PID, then tcpdump will flush the buffer so you can see the output. That’s kind of a pain but I tested it and it seems to work.

redirecting to a file also buffers

It’s not just pipes, this will also buffer:

sudo tcpdump -ni any port 53 > output.txt

Redirecting to a file doesn’t have the same “Ctrl-C will totally destroy the contents of the buffer” problem though – in my experience it usually behaves more like you’d want, where the contents of the buffer get written to the file before the program exits. I’m not 100% sure whether this is something you can always rely on or not.

a bunch of potential ways to avoid buffering

Okay, let’s talk solutions. Let’s say you’ve run this command:

tail -f /some/log/file | grep thing1 | grep thing2

I asked people on Mastodon how they would solve this in practice and there were 5 basic approaches. Here they are:

solution 1: run a program that finishes quickly

Historically my solution to this has been to just avoid the “command writing to pipe slowly” situation completely and instead run a program that will finish quickly like this:

cat /some/log/file | grep thing1 | grep thing2 | tail

This doesn’t do the same thing as the original command but it does mean that you get to avoid thinking about these weird buffering issues.

(you could also do grep thing1 /some/log/file but I often prefer to use an “unnecessary” cat)

solution 2: remember the “line buffer” flag to grep

You could remember that grep has a flag to avoid buffering and pass it like this:

tail -f /some/log/file | grep --line-buffered thing1 | grep thing2

solution 3: use awk

Some people said that if they’re specifically dealing with a multiple greps situation, they’ll rewrite it to use a single awk instead, like this:

tail -f /some/log/file |  awk '/thing1/ && /thing2/'

Or you would write a more complicated grep, like this:

tail -f /some/log/file |  grep -E 'thing1.*thing2'

(awk also buffers, so for this to work you’ll want awk to be the last command in the pipeline)

solution 4: use stdbuf

stdbuf uses LD_PRELOAD to turn off libc’s buffering, and you can use it to turn off output buffering like this:

tail -f /some/log/file | stdbuf -o0 grep thing1 | grep thing2

Like any LD_PRELOAD solution it’s a bit unreliable – it doesn’t work on static binaries, I think won’t work if the program isn’t using libc’s buffering, and doesn’t always work on Mac OS. Harry Marr has a really nice How stdbuf works post.

solution 5: use unbuffer

unbuffer program will force the program’s output to be a TTY, which means that it’ll behave the way it normally would on a TTY (less buffering, colour output, etc). You could use it in this example like this:

tail -f /some/log/file | unbuffer grep thing1 | grep thing2

Unlike stdbuf it will always work, though it might have unwanted side effects, for example grep thing1’s will also colour matches.

If you want to install unbuffer, it’s in the expect package.

that’s all the solutions I know about!

It’s a bit hard for me to say which one is “best”, I think personally I’m mostly likely to use unbuffer because I know it’s always going to work.

If I learn about more solutions I’ll try to add them to this post.

I’m not really sure how often this comes up

I think it’s not very common for me to have a program that slowly trickles data into a pipe like this, normally if I’m using a pipe a bunch of data gets written very quickly, processed by everything in the pipeline, and then everything exits. The only examples I can come up with right now are:

• tcpdump
• tail -f
• watching log files in a different way like with kubectl logs
• the output of a slow computation

what if there were an environment variable to disable buffering?

I think it would be cool if there were a standard environment variable to turn off buffering, like PYTHONUNBUFFERED in Python. I got this idea from a couple of blog posts by Mark Dominus in 2018. Maybe NO_BUFFER like NO_COLOR?

The design seems tricky to get right; Mark points out that NETBSD has environment variables called STDBUF, STDBUF1, etc which gives you a ton of control over buffering but I imagine most developers don’t want to implement many different environment variables to handle a relatively minor edge case.

I’m also curious about whether there are any programs that just automatically flush their output buffers after some period of time (like 1 second). It feels like it would be nice in theory but I can’t think of any program that does that so I imagine there are some downsides.

stuff I left out

Some things I didn’t talk about in this post since these posts have been getting pretty long recently and seriously does anyone REALLY want to read 3000 words about buffering?

• the difference between line buffering and having totally unbuffered output
• how buffering to stderr is different from buffering to stdout
• this post is only about buffering that happens inside the program, your operating system’s TTY driver also does a little bit of buffering sometimes
• other reasons you might need to flush your output other than “you’re writing to a pipe”

I like writing Javascript without a build system and for the millionth time yesterday I ran into a problem where I needed to figure out how to import a Javascript library in my code without using a build system, and it took FOREVER to figure out how to import it because the library’s setup instructions assume that you’re using a build system.

Luckily at this point I’ve mostly learned how to navigate this situation and either successfully use the library or decide it’s too difficult and switch to a different library, so here’s the guide I wish I had to importing Javascript libraries years ago.

I’m only going to talk about using Javacript libraries on the frontend, and only about how to use them in a no-build-system setup.

In this post I’m going to talk about:

1. the three main types of Javascript files a library might provide (ES Modules, the “classic” global variable kind, and CommonJS)
2. how to figure out which types of files a Javascript library includes in its build
3. ways to import each type of file in your code

the three kinds of Javascript files

There are 3 basic types of Javascript files a library can provide:

1. the “classic” type of file that defines a global variable. This is the kind of file that you can just <script src> and it’ll Just Work. Great if you can get it but not always available
2. an ES module (which may or may not depend on other files, we’ll get to that)
3. a “CommonJS” module. This is for Node, you can’t use it in a browser at all without using a build system.

I’m not sure if there’s a better name for the “classic” type but I’m just going to call it “classic”. Also there’s a type called “AMD” but I’m not sure how relevant it is in 2024.

Now that we know the 3 types of files, let’s talk about how to figure out which of these the library actually provides!

where to find the files: the NPM build

Every Javascript library has a build which it uploads to NPM. You might be thinking (like I did originally) – Julia! The whole POINT is that we’re not using Node to build our library! Why are we talking about NPM?

But if you’re using a link from a CDN like https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/Chart.js/4.4.1/chart.umd.min.js, you’re still using the NPM build! All the files on the CDNs originally come from NPM.

Because of this, I sometimes like to npm install the library even if I’m not planning to use Node to build my library at all – I’ll just create a new temp folder, npm install there, and then delete it when I’m done. I like being able to poke around in the files in the NPM build on my filesystem, because then I can be 100% sure that I’m seeing everything that the library is making available in its build and that the CDN isn’t hiding something from me.

So let’s npm install a few libraries and try to figure out what types of Javascript files they provide in their builds!

example library 1: chart.js

First let’s look inside Chart.js, a plotting library.

$ cd /tmp/whatever
$ npm install chart.js
$ cd node_modules/chart.js/dist
$ ls *.*js
chart.cjs  chart.js  chart.umd.js  helpers.cjs  helpers.js

This library seems to have 3 basic options:

option 1: chart.cjs. The .cjs suffix tells me that this is a CommonJS file, for using in Node. This means it’s impossible to use it directly in the browser without some kind of build step.

option 2:chart.js. The .js suffix by itself doesn’t tell us what kind of file it is, but if I open it up, I see import '@kurkle/color'; which is an immediate sign that this is an ES module – the import ... syntax is ES module syntax.

option 3: chart.umd.js. “UMD” stands for “Universal Module Definition”, which I think means that you can use this file either with a basic <script src>, CommonJS, or some third thing called AMD that I don’t understand.

how to use a UMD file

When I was using Chart.js I picked Option 3. I just needed to add this to my code:

<script src="./chart.umd.js"> </script>

and then I could use the library with the global Chart environment variable. Couldn’t be easier. I just copied chart.umd.js into my Git repository so that I didn’t have to worry about using NPM or the CDNs going down or anything.

the build files aren’t always in the dist directory

A lot of libraries will put their build in the dist directory, but not always! The build files’ location is specified in the library’s package.json.

For example here’s an excerpt from Chart.js’s package.json.

  "jsdelivr": "./dist/chart.umd.js",
  "unpkg": "./dist/chart.umd.js",
  "main": "./dist/chart.cjs",
  "module": "./dist/chart.js",

I think this is saying that if you want to use an ES Module (module) you should use dist/chart.js, but the jsDelivr and unpkg CDNs should use ./dist/chart.umd.js. I guess main is for Node.

chart.js’s package.json also says "type": "module", which according to this documentation tells Node to treat files as ES modules by default. I think it doesn’t tell us specifically which files are ES modules and which ones aren’t but it does tell us that something in there is an ES module.

example library 2: @atcute/oauth-browser-client

@atcute/oauth-browser-client is a library for logging into Bluesky with OAuth in the browser.

Let’s see what kinds of Javascript files it provides in its build!

$ npm install @atcute/oauth-browser-client
$ cd node_modules/@atcute/oauth-browser-client/dist
$ ls *js
constants.js  dpop.js  environment.js  errors.js  index.js  resolvers.js

It seems like the only plausible root file in here is index.js, which looks something like this:

export { configureOAuth } from './environment.js';
export * from './errors.js';
export * from './resolvers.js';

This export syntax means it’s an ES module. That means we can use it in the browser without a build step! Let’s see how to do that.

how to use an ES module with importmaps

Using an ES module isn’t an easy as just adding a <script src="whatever.js">. Instead, if the ES module has dependencies (like @atcute/oauth-browser-client does) the steps are:

1. Set up an import map in your HTML
2. Put import statements like import { configureOAuth } from '@atcute/oauth-browser-client'; in your JS code
3. Include your JS code in your HTML like this: <script type="module" src="YOURSCRIPT.js"></script>

The reason we need an import map instead of just doing something like import { BrowserOAuthClient } from "./oauth-client-browser.js" is that internally the module has more import statements like import {something} from @atcute/client, and we need to tell the browser where to get the code for @atcute/client and all of its other dependencies.

Here’s what the importmap I used looks like for @atcute/oauth-browser-client:

<script type="importmap">
{
  "imports": {
    "nanoid": "./node_modules/nanoid/bin/dist/index.js",
    "nanoid/non-secure": "./node_modules/nanoid/non-secure/index.js",
    "nanoid/url-alphabet": "./node_modules/nanoid/url-alphabet/dist/index.js",
    "@atcute/oauth-browser-client": "./node_modules/@atcute/oauth-browser-client/dist/index.js",
    "@atcute/client": "./node_modules/@atcute/client/dist/index.js",
    "@atcute/client/utils/did": "./node_modules/@atcute/client/dist/utils/did.js"
  }
}
</script>

Getting these import maps to work is pretty fiddly, I feel like there must be a tool to generate them automatically but I haven’t found one yet. It’s definitely possible to write a script that automatically generates the importmaps using esbuild’s metafile but I haven’t done that and maybe there’s a better way.

I decided to set up importmaps yesterday to get github.com/jvns/bsky-oauth-example to work, so there’s some example code in that repo.

Also someone pointed me to Simon Willison’s download-esm, which will download an ES module and rewrite the imports to point to the JS files directly so that you don’t need importmaps. I haven’t tried it yet but it seems like a great idea.

problems with importmaps: too many files

I did run into some problems with using importmaps in the browser though – it needed to download dozens of Javascript files to load my site, and my webserver in development couldn’t keep up for some reason. I kept seeing files fail to load randomly and then had to reload the page and hope that they would succeed this time.

It wasn’t an issue anymore when I deployed my site to production, so I guess it was a problem with my local dev environment.

Also one slightly annoying thing about ES modules in general is that you need to be running a webserver to use them, I’m sure this is for a good reason but it’s easier when you can just open your index.html file without starting a webserver.

Because of the “too many files” thing I think actually using ES modules with importmaps in this way isn’t actually that appealing to me, but it’s good to know it’s possible.

how to use an ES module without importmaps

If the ES module doesn’t have dependencies then it’s even easier – you don’t need the importmaps! You can just:

• put <script type="module" src="YOURCODE.js"></script> in your HTML. The type="module" is important.
• put import {whatever} from "https://example.com/whatever.js" in YOURCODE.js

alternative: use esbuild

If you don’t want to use importmaps, you can also use a build system like esbuild. I talked about how to do that in Some notes on using esbuild, but this blog post is about ways to avoid build systems completely so I’m not going to talk about that option here. I do still like esbuild though and I think it’s a good option in this case.

what’s the browser support for importmaps?

CanIUse says that importmaps are in “Baseline 2023: newly available across major browsers” so my sense is that in 2024 that’s still maybe a little bit too new? I think I would use importmaps for some fun experimental code that I only wanted like myself and 12 people to use, but if I wanted my code to be more widely usable I’d use esbuild instead.

example library 3: @atproto/oauth-client-browser

Let’s look at one final example library! This is a different Bluesky auth library than @atcute/oauth-browser-client.

$ npm install @atproto/oauth-client-browser
$ cd node_modules/@atproto/oauth-client-browser/dist
$ ls *js
browser-oauth-client.js  browser-oauth-database.js  browser-runtime-implementation.js  errors.js  index.js  indexed-db-store.js  util.js

Again, it seems like only real candidate file here is index.js. But this is a different situation from the previous example library! Let’s take a look at index.js:

There’s a bunch of stuff like this in index.js:

__exportStar(require("@atproto/oauth-client"), exports);
__exportStar(require("./browser-oauth-client.js"), exports);
__exportStar(require("./errors.js"), exports);
var util_js_1 = require("./util.js");

This require() syntax is CommonJS syntax, which means that we can’t use this file in the browser at all, we need to use some kind of build step, and ESBuild won’t work either.

Also in this library’s package.json it says "type": "commonjs" which is another way to tell it’s CommonJS.

how to use a CommonJS module with esm.sh

Originally I thought it was impossible to use CommonJS modules without learning a build system, but then someone Bluesky told me about esm.sh! It’s a CDN that will translate anything into an ES Module. skypack.dev does something similar, I’m not sure what the difference is but one person mentioned that if one doesn’t work sometimes they’ll try the other one.

For @atproto/oauth-client-browser using it seems pretty simple, I just need to put this in my HTML:

<script type="module" src="script.js"> </script>

and then put this in script.js.

import { BrowserOAuthClient } from "https://esm.sh/@atproto/oauth-client-browser@0.3.0"

It seems to Just Work, which is cool! Of course this is still sort of using a build system – it’s just that esm.sh is running the build instead of me. My main concerns with this approach are:

• I don’t really trust CDNs to keep working forever – usually I like to copy dependencies into my repository so that they don’t go away for some reason in the future.
• I’ve heard of some issues with CDNs having security compromises which scares me.
• I don’t really understand what esm.sh is doing.

esbuild can also convert CommonJS modules into ES modules

I also learned that you can also use esbuild to convert a CommonJS module into an ES module, though there are some limitations – the import { BrowserOAuthClient } from syntax doesn’t work. Here’s a github issue about that.

I think the esbuild approach is probably more appealing to me than the esm.sh approach because it’s a tool that I already have on my computer so I trust it more. I haven’t experimented with this much yet though.

summary of the three types of files

Here’s a summary of the three types of JS files you might encounter, options for how to use them, and how to identify them.

Unhelpfully a .js or .min.js file extension could be any of these 3 options, so if the file is something.js you need to do more detective work to figure out what you’re dealing with.

1. “classic” JS files
   • How to use it:: <script src="whatever.js"></script>
   • Ways to identify it:
     • The website has a big friendly banner in its setup instructions saying “Use this with a CDN!” or something
     • A .umd.js extension
     • Just try to put it in a <script src=... tag and see if it works
2. ES Modules
   • Ways to use it:
     • If there are no dependencies, just import {whatever} from "./my-module.js" directly in your code
     • If there are dependencies, create an importmap and import {whatever} from "my-module"
       • or use download-esm to remove the need for an importmap
     • Use esbuild or any ES Module bundler
   • Ways to identify it:
     • Look for an import or export statement. (not module.exports = ..., that’s CommonJS)
     • An .mjs extension
     • maybe "type": "module" in package.json (though it’s not clear to me which file exactly this refers to)
3. CommonJS Modules
   • Ways to use it:
     • Use https://esm.sh to convert it into an ES module, like https://esm.sh/@atproto/oauth-client-browser@0.3.0
     • Use a build somehow (??)
   • Ways to identify it:
     • Look for require() or module.exports = ... in the code
     • A .cjs extension
     • maybe "type": "commonjs" in package.json (though it’s not clear to me which file exactly this refers to)

it’s really nice to have ES modules standardized

The main difference between CommonJS modules and ES modules from my perspective is that ES modules are actually a standard. This makes me feel a lot more confident using them, because browsers commit to backwards compatibility for web standards forever – if I write some code using ES modules today, I can feel sure that it’ll still work the same way in 15 years.

It also makes me feel better about using tooling like esbuild because even if the esbuild project dies, because it’s implementing a standard it feels likely that there will be another similar tool in the future that I can replace it with.

the JS community has built a lot of very cool tools

A lot of the time when I talk about this stuff I get responses like “I hate javascript!!! it’s the worst!!!”. But my experience is that there are a lot of great tools for Javascript (I just learned about https://esm.sh yesterday which seems great! I love esbuild!), and that if I take the time to learn how things works I can take advantage of some of those tools and make my life a lot easier.

So the goal of this post is definitely not to complain about Javascript, it’s to understand the landscape so I can use the tooling in a way that feels good to me.

questions I still have

Here are some questions I still have, I’ll add the answers into the post if I learn the answer.

• Is there a tool that automatically generates importmaps for an ES Module that I have set up locally? (apparently yes: jspm)
• How can I convert a CommonJS module into an ES module on my computer, the way https://esm.sh does? (apparently esbuild can sort of do this, though named exports don’t work)
• When people normally build CommonJS modules into regular JS code, what’s code is doing that? Obviously there are tools like webpack, rollup, esbuild, etc, but do those tools all implement their own JS parsers/static analysis? How many JS parsers are there out there?
• Is there any way to bundle an ES module into a single file (like atcute-client.js), but so that in the browser I can still import multiple different paths from that file (like both @atcute/client/lexicons and @atcute/client)?

all the tools

Here’s a list of every tool we talked about in this post:

• Simon Willison’s download-esm which will download an ES module and convert the imports to point at JS files so you don’t need an importmap
• https://esm.sh/ and skypack.dev
• esbuild
• JSPM can generate importmaps

Writing this post has made me think that even though I usually don’t want to have a build that I run every time I update the project, I might be willing to have a build step (using download-esm or something) that I run only once when setting up the project and never run again except maybe if I’m updating my dependency versions.

that’s all!

Thanks to Marco Rogers who taught me a lot of the things in this post. I’ve probably made some mistakes in this post and I’d love to know what they are – let me know on Bluesky or Mastodon!

I added a new section to this site a couple weeks ago called TIL (“today I learned”).

the goal: save interesting tools & facts I posted on social media

One kind of thing I like to post on Mastodon/Bluesky is “hey, here’s a cool thing”, like the great SQLite repl litecli, or the fact that cross compiling in Go Just Works and it’s amazing, or cryptographic right answers, or this great diff tool. Usually I don’t want to write a whole blog post about those things because I really don’t have much more to say than “hey this is useful!”

It started to bother me that I didn’t have anywhere to put those things: for example recently I wanted to use diffdiff and I just could not remember what it was called.

the solution: make a new section of this blog

So I quickly made a new folder called /til/, added some custom styling (I wanted to style the posts to look a little bit like a tweet), made a little Rake task to help me create new posts quickly (rake new_til), and set up a separate RSS Feed for it.

I think this new section of the blog might be more for myself than anything, now when I forget the link to Cryptographic Right Answers I can hopefully look it up on the TIL page. (you might think “julia, why not use bookmarks??” but I have been failing to use bookmarks for my whole life and I don’t see that changing ever, putting things in public is for whatever reason much easier for me)

So far it’s been working, often I can actually just make a quick post in 2 minutes which was the goal.

inspired by Simon Willison’s TIL blog

My page is inspired by Simon Willison’s great TIL blog, though my TIL posts are a lot shorter.

I don’t necessarily want everything to be archived

This came about because I spent a lot of time on Twitter, so I’ve been thinking about what I want to do about all of my tweets.

I keep reading the advice to “POSSE” (“post on your own site, syndicate elsewhere”), and while I find the idea appealing in principle, for me part of the appeal of social media is that it’s a little bit ephemeral. I can post polls or questions or observations or jokes and then they can just kind of fade away as they become less relevant.

I find it a lot easier to identify specific categories of things that I actually want to have on a Real Website That I Own:

• blog posts here!
• comics at https://wizardzines.com/comics/!
• now TILs at https://jvns.ca/til/)

and then let everything else be kind of ephemeral.

I really believe in the advice to make email lists though – the first two (blog posts & comics) both have email lists and RSS feeds that people can subscribe to if they want. I might add a quick summary of any TIL posts from that week to the “blog posts from this week” mailing list.